What is Robo investing?
What is Robo investing?
What is the meaning of robo investing? In traditional, when people
want to invest their money for making profit, they will look for financial
experts like financial advisor to help them allocate asset. With the
development of technology, nowadays we can use the robo advisor to achieve
above goal instead of financial advisor. First of all, you just need to fill
out a short survey answering the questions about age, risk tolerance and
retirement goals, and then the robo advisor will automatically manage your
portfolio.
In the US market, there are many developing robo advisor companies
as listed below:
Company
for robo advisor
IronFX
|
FXTM
|
Nutmeg
|
ScalableCapital
|
Easyfolio
|
Ginmon
|
Munnypot
|
Schwab
|
Hedgeable
|
Moneyfarm
|
Growney
|
MarketRiders
|
Whitebox
|
Vanguard
|
Blackrock
|
Betterment
|
Source: https://roboadvisors.com/reviews
And its common advantages as follows:
1.Hands Off Investing2.Low Fees3.Regular
Rebalancing4.Tax-Efficient Investing5.Low Minimum Initial Investment
Requirements
Above advantages we can compare Betterment with Wealthfront, both
of them are famous in wealthy management and have lower fee than human advisor.
Comparison
Between robo advisor and human advisor in fee
Betterment
|
Wealthfront
|
Human advisor
|
|
Annual Fees
|
0.15%-0.40%/yr.
|
0.25%/yr.
|
1%/yr
|
Source: https://investorjunkie.com/36355/betterment-vs-wealthfront/
Is its prosperous perspective in the future? In the website of
Statista, which provide more statistic information in robo advisor, it provides
the trend in the growth amount of AUM worldwide from 2019 to 2013.
Worldwide
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
2023
|
AUM
|
$980,540.8M
|
$1,442,027.8M
|
$1,863,437.6M
|
$2,231,721.3M
|
$2,552,265.1M
|
Above table shows that robo advisor market are increasing growth,
and the website predict that AUM are expected to exhibt an annual growth rate
(CAGR 2019-2023) of 27.0%. Therefore, the next question is whether are
traditional investment companies also applying robo advisor in order to compete
with the innovative fintech companies? The answer is yes. In the pass the
famous investment management corporations such as Blackrock now are creating
the robo advisor for serving their clients. We can see the table as listed below:
Established
Firms
|
Name of
robo advisor
|
Blackrock
|
Future Advisor
|
Fidelity
|
Fidelity Go
|
Schwab
|
Schwab Intelligent Portfolios
|
Vanguard
|
Vanguard Personal Advisor
|
Why robo investing is so popular now? Is it really better than
human advisor? I use the website ‘Statista’ to gather more useful information
and integrate it to explain next questions. Please read the top rank position
of AUM (US dollar) of robo advisor as listed below:
Ranking
|
Country
|
AUM (2019)
|
User (2019)
|
1
|
US
|
$749,703,000,000
|
8283600
|
2
|
China
|
$179,076,000,000
|
34344800
|
3
|
UK
|
$14,803,000,000
|
572700
|
4
|
Germany
|
$8,460,000,000
|
312300
|
5
|
Canada
|
$5,448,000,000
|
274600
|
6
|
Japan
|
$4,348,000,000
|
255600
|
7
|
Australia
|
$2,197,000,000
|
95500
|
total
|
$964,035,000,000
|
44139100
|
Ranking
|
worldwide
|
AUM (2019)
|
User (2019)
|
1
|
Americas
|
$757,102,000,000
|
8812300
|
2
|
Asia
|
$190,207,000,000
|
35239500
|
3
|
Europe
|
$30,052,000,000
|
1509100
|
4
|
Australia
& Oceania
|
$2,819,000,000
|
119900
|
5
|
Africa
|
$362,000,000
|
93000
|
total
|
$980,542,000,000
|
45773800
|
Ranking
|
Asia area
|
AUM (2019)
|
User (2019)
|
1
|
East Asia
|
$184,405,000,000
|
34560400
|
2
|
Southeast
Asia
|
$3,234,000,000
|
271200
|
3
|
West Asia
|
$2,313,000,000
|
202000
|
4
|
Central
Asia
|
$157,000,000
|
24300
|
5
|
South Asia
|
$98,000,000
|
91600
|
total
|
$190,207,000,000
|
35149500
|
Ranking
|
America
area
|
AUM (2019)
|
User (2019)
|
1
|
North
America
|
$755,248,000,000
|
8574500
|
2
|
South
America
|
$1,634,000,000
|
201600
|
3
|
Central
America
|
$127,000,000
|
20700
|
4
|
Caribbean
|
$93,000,000
|
15600
|
total
|
$757,102,000,000
|
8812400
|
When I observe above Table I ranged, the AUM in the top 7
countries occupy the 98.3%AUM of the worldwide. Further observation, the AUM
ranking from country, except China, all these top-ranking countries are
developed country, and the AUM in developed countries occupy the 80%AUM of
worldwide, which means to some extent developed countries are easier to accept
robo advisor. On the other hand, form the type of worldwide, American and Asia
range as top 1 and 2. And further research, you can see the top1 AUM by robo
advisor is in US, and secondary of AUM is in China. China is a developing
country, why is becoming number 2 ranking in AUM? I personally consider the
reason is depending on the knowing the level of AI. US and China are continuing
to focus on educating and popularizing people in the application of AI, so it
is easy for people to accept robo advisor instead of human advisor especially
in the field of wealth management..
I come from Taiwan, and notice the issue relative to Asia area.
Although the website didn’t provide the information about Taiwan, we still can
see the trend from the listed below:
ranking
|
East and
Southeast Asia
|
AUM (2019)
|
User (2019)
|
1
|
China
|
$179,076,000,000
|
34344800
|
2
|
Japan
|
$4,348,000,000
|
255600
|
3
|
Singapore
|
$3,026,000,000
|
189700
|
4
|
South Korea
|
$613,000,000
|
27900
|
5
|
Hong Kong
|
$366,000,000
|
21900
|
ranking
|
Southeast
Asia
|
AUM (2019)
|
User (2019)
|
1
|
Singapore
|
$3,026,000,000
|
189700
|
2
|
Malaysia
|
$62,000,000
|
19700
|
3
|
Vietnam
|
$36,000,000
|
11000
|
4
|
Thailand
|
$35,000,000
|
13600
|
5
|
Indonesia
|
$30,000,000
|
23200
|
6
|
Philippines
|
$25,000,000
|
9800
|
7
|
Brunei
Darussalam
|
$7,000,000
|
800
|
7
|
Myanmar
|
$7,000,000
|
1900
|
8
|
Cambodia
|
$4,000,000
|
1000
|
9
|
Laos
|
$2,000,000
|
400
|
10
|
Timor-Leste
|
0
|
100
|
total
|
$3,234,000,000
|
271200
|
ranking
|
East Asia
|
AUM (2019)
|
User (2019)
|
1
|
China
|
$179,076,000,000
|
34344800
|
2
|
Japan
|
$4,348,000,000
|
255600
|
3
|
South Korea
|
$613,000,000
|
27900
|
4
|
Hong Kong
|
$366,000,000
|
21900
|
5
|
Mongolia
|
$1,000,000
|
300
|
total
|
$184,404,000,000
|
34650500
|
Firstly, the AUM in East and Southeast Asia separately occupy the
18.8 %and 0.3%AUM of worldwide, which is lower proportion than North America. Why
is the proportion in Asia lower than Americas? I personal think the Asia
customer prefer human advisor than robo advisor. Because we built the trust in
long term relationship with personal financial advisor, in short term it is
hard for customer to change their concept using robo advisor. In addition, the
technique of robo advisor is novel, and the regulation by law is still unclear
specification in many Asia country. But we can see the area from East and
Southeast Asia, the top 5 by sequence are China, Japan, Singapore, South Korea
and Hong Kong. We all know above countries have the International Finance
Centre such as Shanghai, Tokyo...etc., which imply the higher level of
international, the easier to gather capital, the easier to use the robo
advisor. Furthermore, in southeast Asia, the AUM in Singapore is virtually
above 50 times more than that in other area, which means other place still has
potential to develop the robo advisor. But we still need to watch whether the
money of investment in robo advisor will flow to place of highest international
market instead of lagging country which is creating the robo advisor.
lastly, another point we should notice, the user in China is four
times more than that in US, but the AUM in US is four times more than that in
China. Why is this happen? Whether is people in US richer than those in China?
Or whether is the large investment institutions in US investing more money in
the fund of robo advisor than those in China? Or whether is the technology
reducing the threshold for China investor? Above questions need us to further
research and discussion.
In my point of view, I think the robo advisor is more advantages
than human.
First, Robo advisor can be anytime and anywhere to monitor and
remind customer when the portfolio is deviation from the set target. In
addition, with the investing threshold in robo is lower than that in human,
nowadays everyone has its smart phone especially in the young people, which can
help young man and people who have not own high asset enhance the investing
behavior and thus everyone can invest.
In addition, the most of robo advisor use the passive investment
such as ETF instead of active investment. For me, it is relatively stable and
easy to follow the market. The investors follow market in long term, they don’t
need to watch the market at any time. The investor just needs to care about the
trend of economic or the trend of industry in the future, they don’t need to
understand fundamental analysis and technique analysis.
In a word, the robo advisor provides the new generation enter a
new invest field. People don’t need any financial background and many moneys to
do a financial planning, so it is the time for Financial Inclusion System.
For the status quo of Taiwan, it is still
not easy that people especially in high asset clients are using robo investing.
I think the reason is that people in Taiwan need to “warm” communication and
service, it is not easy to convince people only using the “cold” robo machine. So, my personal
observation is that we can combine the advantages from the human and robo advisor
to offer the high-quality service.
Supplement my previous explanation:
Active
and passive investment strategy:
The definition of active investing refers
to an investment strategy that involves ongoing buying and selling activity by
the investor. Active investors purchase investments and continuously monitor
their activity to exploit profitable conditions. On the contrary, passive
investing is an investment strategy to maximize returns by minimizing buying
and selling.
Furthermore discussion, active investors
typically look at the price movements of their stocks many times a day, but
passive investors do not seek to profit from short-term price fluctuations or
market timing, which means buying a security with the intention to own it long
term.
The pros and cons in active and passive as
listed follows:
Active investing
|
Passive investing
|
|
Advantage
|
Flexibility
Hedging
Tax management
|
Ultra-low fees
Transparency
Tax efficiency
|
Disadvantage
|
Very expensive
Active risk
|
Too limited
Small returns
|
In a word, active investing need investors
to research by fundamental and technique analysis and to build their portfolio.
The goal is to defeat the return on market. However, Passive investing don’t
need to further research in stock, rather choose a basket of stocks such as ETF
to follow the index and acquire average rate of return on market.
留言
張貼留言